Eddie mabo among the queensland greats of 2017 announced in. The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were already inhabitants present even if those inhabitants had. Nevertheless, it appears that the queensland authorities exercised some. Correct merging rules in queensland as driving instructors we are exposed to the roads and its various conditions 7 days per week. It allows access to land for living, traditional purposes, hunting or fishing andor to teach laws and. Bonita mabo holding a mabo v qld we won sign, murray island, queensland, june 1992, 2 trevor graham. In the 1950s eddie worked on various trochus fishing luggers out of mer. In recognising the traditional rights of the meriam people to their islands in the eastern torres strait, the court also held that native title existed for all indigenous people in australia prior to cooks instructions and the establishment of the british colony of new south wales. Free essays on mabo v queensland no 2 case brief brainia. The high court said the annexation had not and that the same principles would apply to britain. Correct merging rules in queensland streetwise driver.
The 1992 mabo decision led to the native title act 1993 which created a framework that recognises aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples have rights to, and interests in, certain land because of their traditional laws and customs. Remote work advice from the largest allremote company. Memory of the world register nomination form australia the mabo case manuscripts part a essential information the personal papers of edward koiki mabo are held alongside legal and historical materials relating to the mabo case. Australian court case, canberra, international convention, mabo v queensland no. Mr mabo was among the six individuals and two organisations named as queensland greats on tuesday night. As listed in this citation mabo ors v queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 eddie mabo from business 402 at university of western sydney. To establish its long term consequences may require considerable litigation, or perhaps federal legislative interpreta tion. I am honoured to present the mabo oration, not only as a lawyer, but as a torres strait.
The queensland plan the queensland plan is an aspirational community vision. Queensland 1992 as a catalyst for the native title act. As listed in this citation mabo ors v queensland no 2 1992. The queensland police burnt down the houses and church of the aboriginal community living at the mapoon mission and forcibly relocated the residents to new mapoon near the tip of cape york. While it is designed to show the direction in which queenslanders want to go, there are many options for how we put it into practice.
Mabo v queensland no 2 1992 hca 23 opinions on high. Eddie mabo is the son of robert zezou sambo and annie mabo of the piadaram clan. Mabo v queensland no 2 commonly known as mabo was a landmark high court of australia decision in 1992 recognising native title in australia for the first time. Discuss this statement in terms of what it says about the courage and tenacity of mabo and how people can be effective in bringing about a change in the law. Mabo versus queensland 1992 in the 1992 mabo vs queensland judgement, the high court of australia was asked to consider whether queenslands annexation of the torres strait in 1879 had extinguished the land rights of the people already living there.
Proposal to merge bank of queensland and home building. The mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to. Austlii website legislation native title act 1993 cth background on 20 may 1982, eddie koiki mabo, sam passi, david passi, celuia mapo salee and james rice. The high court required the supreme court of queensland to determine the facts on which the case was based but while the case was with. Home yarns pattern boutique designer studio guide to style. On 12 june 1991 the torres strait island land act 1991 qld 9 is enacted and the queensland 3 mabo v queensland no. Mabo v state of queensland no 2 22 september 2016 5. The judgments of the high court in the mabo case inserted the legal doctrine of native title into australian law. The mabo decision, and the full text of the decision in mabo and others v. In 1992, after a tenyear court battle by eddie mabo and other traditional land.
Torres strait islander people in qld queensland human rights. The queensland government had earlier tried to extinguish the meriam peoples property rights under the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985. Mabo and the discursive constitution of the australian nation abstract this essay is centred around what is arguably the most potentially constitutionally radical, and almost certainly the most politically contentious decision of the australian high court in its history. Mabo v queensland no 1, was a significant court case decided in the high court of australia on 8 december 1988. Join us in september as the hon margaret white ao presents an indepth look at one of the most important judgments ever delivered by the high court, mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 the hon margaret white ao acted as junior counsel for the queensland government for the ten years of litigation. She brings a unique and valuable perspective to this landmark. All queenslandersgovernments, business, industry, community groups and individualsare encouraged to. Almost 161,000 hectares of land known as bromley was formally handed back to traditional owners by minister furner, on behalf of the palaszczuk. The mabo decision, and the full text of the decision in mabo. However, the high court ruled in 1988 mabo v the state of queensland no. John oxley library, state library of queensland, australia. It found that the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985, which attempted to retrospectively abolish native title rights, was not valid according to the racial discrimination act 1975. The leader of the case was eddie mabo hence the notorious name for the case the mabo decision. To merge the two by recognising native title rights.
John douglas, then premier of the colony, sent the governor of queensland a memorandum dated 27 december 1877 containing the following. Government mail merge lists about queensland and its. Minister for aboriginal and torres strait islander partnerships curtis pitt today reflected on the significance of mabo day as an important date in. This opened the way for claims by aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples to their traditional rights to land and compensation. Bonita mabo with her children celuia and eddie holding mabo v qld we won signs, murray island, queenslan. You can filter on reading intentions from the list, as well as view them within your profile read the guide. The high court is the highest court in australias judicial system. Bonita mabo holding a mabo v qld we won sign, murray island, queensland, june 1992, 1 trevor graham. To establish its long term consequences may require considerable litigation, or perhaps federal legislative interpreta. Mabo v state of queensland no 2 university of queensland.
The high court rejected the doctrine of terra nullius, in favour of the common law doctrine of aboriginal title, and overruled milirrpum v nabalco pty ltd 1971, a contrary decision of the supreme court of the northern territory. The mabo decision continues to influence reconciliation with 3. Eddie mabo and his legal team outside the high court in 1991. Leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 will be presented by the hon margaret white ao. A sort of police surveillance is even now exercised over. The mabo decision was named after eddie mabo, the man who challenged the australian legal. Mabo v queensland no 2 laws2381 property, equity and. Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. Mabo v queensland pdf mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23 1992. Go to front page search the site torres strait island regional council facebook page. Mail merge lists for cabinet ministers, directorsgeneneral and the legislative assembly. As reconciliation advocates our members are committed to working with schools, teachers, parents and community members in a variety of local, regional and state. Transcript of proceedingsin the high court of australia between eddie mabo, david passi, james riceand the state of queensland proceedings for 2831 may 1991, 3 june 1992, and 8 december 1992. Eddie mabo v the state of queensland susan burton phillips 1.
The mabo case began when the plaintiffs, the merriam people of the murray islands in the torres strait initiated proceedings in the high court in 1982, in retort to the queensland amendment act 1982, which. Mabo v queensland no 2 queensland university of technology. The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were already inhabitants present even if those inhabitants had been regarded at. Jun 02, 2017 the 1992 mabo decision led to the native title act 1993 which created a framework that recognises aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples have rights to, and interests in, certain land because of their traditional laws and customs. Posted in case pages, decided cases, opinions tagged mabo v queensland no 2 1992 hca 23, minister of state for the army v dalziel 1944 hca 4, national security act 1939 cth s 5, native title, western australia v ward 2002 hca 28. Aug 26, 2014 two hundred and four years after the british fl ag was planted on australian soil, the high court of australias 1992 mabo decision established that native title is recognised under australian law. On 20 may 1982, eddie koiki mabo, sam passi, david passi, celuia mapo salee and james rice began their legal claim for ownership of their lands on the island of mer in the torres strait between australia and papua new guinea. Jun 07, 2017 eddie mabo and his legal team outside the high court in 1991.
Like that of the united states, australias aboriginal law differs in significant respects from that of canada. One of the major concerns we see are the courtesies or lack of around merging. Mr koiki eddie mabo, mr james rice and rev david passi, three men born on the torres strait island of mer or murray, in english, were joint plaintiffs in the cases referred to as mabo no. A heavy weight of constitutional authority, however, points to a simple conclusion. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992. Reconciliation queensland is committed to education as an essential element in developing socially just and respectful relationships between indigenous and nonindigenous queenslanders. It is short for mabo and others v queensland no 2 1992. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992 175 clr 1 1992. Queensland no 2 leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 presented by the hon margaret white ao selden society australian chapter cordially invites you to lecture four in our 2016 lecture series thursday 22 september 2016, 5. When the lane is clear, vehicle a is free to move across.
Atns agreements, treaties and negotiated settlements project. At the age of seventeen he was exiled from mer by the island council. The legal decision was made by the high court on 3 june 1992. Mar 06, 2020 mail merge lists for cabinet ministers, directorsgeneneral and the legislative assembly.
Five things you should know about the mabo decision the. Brisbane, evidence, exile, mabo, edward koiki, mabo v queensland no. In 1879, queensland extended its boundary to include murray. Since the plaintiffs in mabo did not deny the crowns sovereignty over the murray islands nor the crowns radical title to the land, the principal question in mabo was whether the annexation of the murray islands to the colony of queensland in 1879 vested. The judgement ruled that the common law as it existed. After eddies mother died in childbirth, he was adopted under customary law by his uncle benny mabo and aunt maiga.
The mabo decision was a court case that commenced on the 20 th of may in the year 1982. Lets look at merging situation number one, when one marked lane comes to an end. Many people were making large amounts of money from pearling and fishing in the torres strait and the queensland government wanted to share the profit. Correct merging rules in queensland streetwise driver training. Queensland takes control in 1872, the queensland government claimed that many of the islands in the torres strait belonged to them. The selden society is hosting a lecture on the subject of mabo v the state of queensland as part of the 2016 lecture series. Environmental education resources to commemorate earth days 50th anniversary. The mabo decision, and the full text of the decision in. The proposal to annex coastal islands that were not already part of queensland found favour with the executive council. Eddie mabo among the queensland greats of 2017 announced. Eddie mabo was an indigenous activist whose efforts.
Two hundred and four years after the british fl ag was planted on australian soil, the high court of australias 1992 mabo decision established that native title is recognised under australian law. To maintain the pages relevant and succinct, we have a dedicated mabo page for each one of the subjects in which it is covered, which only contains the issues relevant to that subject. This is the 1992 native title decision mabo v queensland no. Mabo versus queensland 1992 in the 1992 mabo vs queensland judgement, the high court of australia was asked to consider whether queensland s annexation of the torres strait in 1879 had extinguished the land rights of the people already living there. The high court of australia has also considered the question of the basis and nature of aboriginal rights.
A group of men from meriam fought against the queensland government for acknowledgement of the rights of aboriginal as the traditional owners of their land. The wider significance of mabo v queensland, 17 no 4 alternative l. The merged boqhome entity will have 35 branches in western australia, and an expanded business banking. Foundations of the legal system, 2nd ed, melbourne, oxford university press, 2009, pp. May, 2015 posted in case pages, decided cases, opinions tagged mabo v queensland no 2 1992 hca 23, minister of state for the army v dalziel 1944 hca 4, national security act 1939 cth s 5, native title, western australia v ward 2002 hca 28. The official explanation referred to the rationalisation of missions in the region, but it was clear that the. Mabo is a massive and prolific case which is discussed in many of the subjects offered on this site.
1274 1410 323 194 704 869 807 761 31 82 1066 1019 1191 394 522 1589 637 475 1232 552 1573 846 1593 1415 212 1451 1313 894 231 655 307 4 319 740 1552 35 1596 343 515 471 440 935 231 896